Poochigian on mental health
Mental Health services are an important safety net function of counties in partnership with the State of California. The county could not maintain its mental health programs without substantial state and federal support. In fact, because of the nature of mandated services, state government bears substantial responsibility. The way that mental health services are funded is quite complicated.
Past surpluses have withered away. The state’s and county’s fiscal crises present real problems for current service delivery, much less expansion of programs. It’s also important to note that the passage of Proposition 63 – the Mental Health Service Act – in 2004 has resulted in millions of dollars to counties for a range of mental health services and facilities.
While I would thoughtfully evaluate any proposal for expansion of treatment facilities or housing, the current budget climate is not favorable – no matter how one comes down on the merits or shortcomings of the idea. Any evaluation must occur in the context of the overall budget crisis and in consideration of possible funding sources other than the county’s general fund.